#0 by Cornello (Knight of TMD) (0 mesaje) at 2013-08-13 22:21:53 (558 săptămâni în urmă) - [Link]
Menirea topicului:
◊ Familiarizarea userilor TMD cu Cultura Europeană, o cultură care suntem nevoiţi să o studiem şi să o cunoaştem în amănunte
◊ Ridicarea nivelului culturii generale.
◊ Familizarea cu ceea ce e frumos
Reguli:
◊ Pe topic se vor posta ştiri, imagini, fotografii personale de la diferite expoziţii.
◊ Flood-ul şi limbajul neadecvat = PB
◊ Pentru a evita flood-ul va fi cenzurat orice tip de comentariu ce deviază de la temă.
Mesaj util ?
Da10 puncte
1 << PrecedentaUrmătoarea >>
#1 by BandituVVA (Knight of TMD) (0 mesaje) at 2013-08-13 22:22:27 (558 săptămâni în urmă) - [Link]
#11 by BigNickDigger (Power User) (0 mesaje) at 2013-08-15 17:55:28 (557 săptămâni în urmă) - [Link]
#1 bandituvva, si ce are Indonesia cu arta europeana?
Mesaj util ?
Da4 puncte
#12 by dancyu90 (gânditor) (0 mesaje) at 2013-08-15 21:09:58 (557 săptămâni în urmă) - [Link]
Cred că mai mult ai prezentat atracțiile turistice Arta și Cultura Europeană include (limba de comunicare, obiceiuri, religie, istorie, așezare geografică etc., inclusiv și locuri pitorești) mult mai mult decât atât
#17 by K!ng (Fiat justitia, et pereat mundus) (0 mesaje) at 2013-08-20 00:35:13 (557 săptămâni în urmă) - [Link]
“Escape into Reality” is a Painting/Sculpture from Czech artist, Michael Trpák. It is made of cement, wood, and acrylic paint. In the description of his work, Michael tackles 2 of the biggest questions in the art world: What is Art & Why does Art Matter? I’ll let you read it for yourself:
“Escape into reality is a combination of a painting, a relief and a sculpture, it outlines a transition between real and virtual world, between 2d and 3d form, between sensed and tangible... Art tries to be new and discovering, so is an artist a scientist or an inventor? Modern art is a conceptual one and it can seldom defend itself, so does it make an artist a rhetorician or a philosopher? If art needs a form to convey an idea, should an artist be a skillful craftsman? If art is supposed to be digital, is an artist due to be an expert on information technologies? Is an artist a diplomat or a strategist who can present nothing like something and make the viewers believe in it? Who actually is still an artist and who is not? As long as an artist can be all and exercise anything, why everybody is not an artist? Will any object become a piece of art being exhibited in a gallery and will a person who places an object in a gallery become an artist? What is then the purpose of art? – To convey an idea or draw attention by means of a special, ingenious or more sophisticated form to things around us? Or should art be made use of as an aesthetical supplement and is more likely to be the design? If art is supposed to be another form of communication, does it need any commentary? Or – is art something what is useless and that´s why there are galleries to make it usable? As it is difficult to find a boundary between real and virtual, it is impossible to limit the art. I don´t know what a painting thinks about itself if it does think anything at all, nor I know if form is important for art. Supposing there is no form, energy, which can be turned into form, remains... Boundaries don´t exist...
Mesaj util ?
Da5 puncte
#18 by BandituVVA (Knight of TMD) (0 mesaje) at 2013-08-26 20:59:57 (556 săptămâni în urmă) - [Link]
